hostile takeover hong kong

Policy Roadmap

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) instituted the National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong in July 2020. The law – implemented in response to largely peaceful protests throughout 2019 and 2020 – has since been used to reshape the political landscape of the city-state. The NSL granted the CCP the unfettered ability to meddle in every aspect of life in Hong Kong, effectively dismantling the rule of law and judicial system that made Hong Kong an attractive destination for international business. The NSL has also led to the jailing of pro-democracy activists, the closure and muzzling of much of the free press and substantially ceded power from Hong Kong to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

In response, the U.S. President decertified Hong Kong’s special status, making clear that Hong Kong was no longer sufficiently autonomous from the PRC to merit separate treatment under U.S. law.[1] Since then, the U.S. government has undertaken valiant efforts to disentangle itself from the apparatus that secured Hong Kong’s unique treatment under U.S. law. These efforts have been coupled with policies to support the people of Hong Kong. But as of today, many of these efforts remain incomplete and require an update.

Because of the precipitous decline in Hong Kong’s protections of freedom and human rights, many have assumed that there is little that can be done to respond. Hong Kong has even been labeled as a lost cause. While it may be true that – in the short-term – it is unlikely that Hong Kong will revert to its previous freedom-loving, semi-autonomous state, it is inaccurate to say that there are no tools at the U.S. and the international community’s disposal to hold the CCP and Hong Kong officials accountable and alleviate the suffering of the Hong Kong people.

A decision to accept Hong Kong’s fate would result in a repeat of past U.S. foreign policy failures. In essence, it would decouple security-driven policy from human rights-based policy when crafting U.S. policy toward China. Hong Kong is a reminder of the consequences of failing to stop Beijing when it undermines the rights and freedoms of Chinese citizens domestically. This outcome reveals a faulty assumption baked into U.S. policy: that Beijing’s undermining of the rights and freedoms of its own citizens has no consequences beyond its own borders.

The U.S. – in concert with the international community – should pursue a three-pronged strategy that seeks to achieve the following objectives: 1) hold officials and entities in the PRC and Hong Kong accountable for the role they played in undermining freedom in the city-state; 2) support the people who – by choice or by force – remain in Hong Kong; and 3) assist Hong Kongers seeking freedom beyond the borders of the city-state. Any U.S. policy aimed at addressing the situation in Hong Kong should be done with broader U.S. policy toward China in mind with the ultimate goal of undermining the CCP’s increasing control over Hong Kong.

free hong kong

About the Author

Olivia Enos is the former Washington Director for the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation (CFHK Foundation).

free hong kong

About the Author

 Frances Hui, Advocacy and Policy Coordinator for the CFHK Foundation, provided research support in the production of this report. 

Related Posts

CFHK Foundation Joins Coalition to Oppose Termination of US Funding for Radio Free Asia

April 10, 2025 (Washington D.C.) – Today, the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong (CFHK) Foundation joined with a coalition

CFHK Foundation Condemns Targeting of Staffer Frances Hui’s Parents by Hong Kong Police

April 10, 2025 (Washington D.C.) – Today, Hong Kong’s national security police took the parents of Committee for Freedom in

Trump Administration, Congress Target Hong Kong Officials

TOP NEWS The U.S. State Department on Monday imposed sanctions on six Chinese and Hong Kong officials, holding them responsible

US Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Rename Street of Washington’s HKETO after Jimmy Lai

April 1, 2025 – Today, Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) Chairman Chris Smith (R-NJ), Select Committee on the Chinese Communist

hong kong freedom of religion

Washington DC (December 11, 2024)

The Hudson Institute Presents: Sanctioned Voices: Spotlighting China’s Global Repression Wednesday, December 11, 2024 4:00 – 6:30 pm Hudson Institute

freedom of expression hong kong

Symposium in Washington DC: Searching for Solutions to Stop the Intensifying Repression in Hong Kong

This blog is authored by Jon Stivers, Shannon Van Sant & Frances Hui of the Committee for Freedom in Hong

freedom of press hong kong

Hong Kong Symposium 2024

The Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation is hosting our second annual Hong Kong Symposium, in which panelists will

china hong kong relations

Washington DC (July 22, 2024)

Building a Strategy to Counter Hong Kong’s Role in Sanctions Evasion Monday, July 22, 2024 11:00 am – 12:00 pm

hong kong human freedom index

CFHK Foundation’s Frances Hui Testifies before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission on Transnational Repression

15 February 2024 – Today in Washington D.C. the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on “Transnational Repression

Be the first to know what we're up to.

Become a Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation subscriber to receive our weekly newsletter and other updates.